Skip to content

[fix] parsing content-type header for actions - #7195

Merged
dummdidumm merged 7 commits into
sveltejs:masterfrom
repsac-by:fix-split-content-type-for-actions
Oct 10, 2022
Merged

[fix] parsing content-type header for actions#7195
dummdidumm merged 7 commits into
sveltejs:masterfrom
repsac-by:fix-split-content-type-for-actions

Conversation

@repsac-by

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #7187

Please don't delete this checklist! Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following:

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
  • This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.

Tests

  • Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint and pnpm check

Changesets

  • If your PR makes a change that should be noted in one or more packages' changelogs, generate a changeset by running pnpm changeset and following the prompts. All changesets should be patch until SvelteKit 1.0

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Oct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: c4f84f6

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@sveltejs/kit Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@elliott-with-the-longest-name-on-github

elliott-with-the-longest-name-on-github commented Oct 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Did you see the note from @Conduitry about making sure we're doing this for CSRF? I haven't looked yet to see if any changes are necessary -- just want to leave this not as a "TODO".

@repsac-by

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I saw this note, but I don't see how CSRF can be related to incorrect header parsing.

@dummdidumm dummdidumm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The joys of coding with the VS Code web extension without any intellisense 😄

@dummdidumm
dummdidumm merged commit 3bd5245 into sveltejs:master Oct 10, 2022
Rich-Harris added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2026
…arset parameter (#16567)

The prerenderer compares `content-type` with `===`, so `text/html;
charset=utf-8` is not treated as HTML: the page is written without a
`.html` extension and its links are never crawled. `is_content_type`
already normalizes the header for this reason, from #7195 (strip
parameters) and GHSA-gv7g-x59x-wf8f (case-insensitive compare); the two
prerender checks predate both.

Reproduces #13612, closed as unreproducible, using the charset
workaround from #3184. The root `+server.js` error added in #15994 is
gated on the same value, so it can fire for an app that has none.

Co-authored-by: Nic Polumeyv <nicolas.polum@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <richard.a.harris@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect content-type parsing in actions

3 participants