Skip to content

Fix lazy v4 event metadata decoding - #4095

Merged
karthikscale3 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
fix/v4-lazy-event-payload-schema
Sep 11, 2026
Merged

karthikscale3 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
fix/v4-lazy-event-payload-schema

Conversation

@karthikscale3

@karthikscale3 karthikscale3 commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fix v4 lazy event reads failing when an event payload has expired and the server omits its payload field from otherwise valid metadata.

The v4 decoder previously validated every zero-body frame as a fully materialized runtime event. Dashboard observability requests use lazy remote-reference behavior, so an expired payload can legitimately be absent. The decoder now validates lazy metadata by temporarily supplying the expected payload field, removes it from the returned event, and threads remote-reference behavior through list, correlation, and single-event reads. Resolved reads and replay remain strict.

Includes a patch changeset for @workflow/world-vercel.

How did you test your changes?

  • pnpm --filter @workflow/world-vercel test — 31 files, 688 tests passed
  • pnpm --filter @workflow/world-vercel typecheck
  • Focused regression coverage verifies lazy step_completed metadata without result succeeds and resolved events without event data still fail validation.

PR Checklist - Required to merge

  • 📦 Added a patch changeset
  • 🔒 Commit includes DCO sign-off
  • 📝 Pinged @vercel/workflow in a comment

Signed-off-by: Karthik Kalyanaraman <karthik.kalyanaraman@vercel.com>
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2026 01:16
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: d017673

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 17 packages
Name Type
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Building Building Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 4:32pm UTC

@karthikscale3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@vercel/workflow

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

❌ Some tests failed

❌ Failed E2E Tests

▲ Vercel Production (4 failed)

hono-node (1 failed):

  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_41M28N15QW0GXBK6NE88KBDWX5 | 🔍 observability

nest-node (1 failed):

  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow

nuxt-node (2 failed):

  • error handling catchability workflow throw of a non-Error value round-trips verbatim as cause
  • error handling serialization failures step-argument serialization failure is catchable in workflow code

🪟 Windows (1 failed)

nextjs-turbopack-node (1 failed):

  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M28N2Q390GKAE6YHGXEZ0TF4

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

44 flaky tests
  • 'hookGetConflictWithPriorStepWorkflow' - hook.getConflict() does not block step execution (nuxt)
  • 'hookGetConflictWithPriorStepWorkflow' - hook.getConflict() does not block step execution (sveltekit)
  • abortAlreadyAbortedWorkflow: pre-aborted signal seen by step (hono)
  • addTenWorkflow (express)
  • addTenWorkflow (nuxt)
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class (hono)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (nextjs-turbopack)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (vite)
  • completes but prepareCall is not applied (GAP) (sveltekit)
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously (nitro)
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously (tanstack-start)
  • errorSubclassRoundTripWorkflow - first-class Error subclasses survive every serialization boundary (nitro)
  • FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is() (sveltekit)
  • FatalError fails immediately without retries (example)
  • FatalError fails immediately without retries (nextjs-turbopack)
  • FatalError fails immediately without retries (nuxt)
  • getterStepWorkflow - getter functions with "use step" directive (hono)
  • hookClaimOnlyMutexWorkflow - hook works as a pure run mutex without payload data (example)
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion (nextjs-webpack)
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running (nest)
  • hookGetConflictWorkflow - hook.getConflict() resolves with the conflicting run when token is already registered (astro)
  • hookGetConflictWorkflow - hook.getConflict() resolves with the conflicting run when token is already registered (nest)
  • hookGetConflictWorkflow - hook.getConflict() resolves with the conflicting run when token is already registered (nextjs-webpack)
  • hookMinRetentionWorkflow - terminal Hook cannot resume and its token stays unavailable (nuxt)
  • hookMinRetentionWorkflow - terminal Hook cannot resume and its token stays unavailable (sveltekit)
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive (hono)
  • nullByteWorkflow (express)
  • parallelSleepWorkflow (example)
  • positive startIndex (skips first chunk) (nextjs-turbopack)
  • provider tool identity preserved across step boundaries (nextjs-webpack)
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step (nitro)
  • step throw of a non-Error value preserves it as cause on the wrapping FatalError (nextjs-webpack)
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument (nitro)
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument (nitro)
  • StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it (example)
  • StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it (nest)
  • StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it (sveltekit)
  • uncaught step-argument serialization failure fails the run as USER_ERROR without redelivery retries (sveltekit)
  • uncaught step-return-value serialization failure fails the run as USER_ERROR (nest)
  • workflow throw round-trips FatalError + cause through run_failed event (express)
  • WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist (express)
  • WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist (nextjs-turbopack)
  • WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist (nitro)
  • writableForwardedFromStepWorkflow (express)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 16:33:58Z · abandoned wrun_01M28N2AP88PTBAMY1HA9Y3T6R
  • run-pickup-stall · plainModuleDoneHook resumed via plain API route (o2flow shape) (nextjs-webpack) · at 16:42:00Z · abandoned wrun_01M28NHE256AZS2QQB04KHY3T0

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 3658 4 685 4347
✅ 💻 Local Development 3922 0 586 4508
✅ 📦 Local Production 3922 0 586 4508
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 3922 0 586 4508
❌ 🪟 Windows 319 1 2 322
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 68 0 74 142
✅ vercel-http-transport 823 0 143 966
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 557 0 87 644
Total 17218 5 2749 19972
Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 133 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ example-node 133 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ express-node 133 0 28
✅ express-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ fastify-node 133 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 133 0 28
❌ hono-node 132 1 28
✅ hono-quickjs 133 0 28
❌ nest-node 132 1 28
✅ nest-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 158 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 158 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 158 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 158 0 3
✅ nitro-node 133 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 133 0 28
❌ nuxt-node 131 2 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ python-node 66 0 95
✅ sveltekit-node 152 0 9
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 152 0 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 133 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ vite-node 133 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 133 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 8
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 8
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 27
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 27

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 8
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 8
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 27
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 27

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 8
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 8
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 27
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 27

❌ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
❌ nextjs-turbopack-node 159 1 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 160 0 1

✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ python 68 0 74

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 133 0 28
✅ express 133 0 28
✅ hono 133 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 158 0 3
✅ nitro 133 0 28
✅ vite 133 0 28

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 133 0 28
✅ express 133 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 158 0 3
✅ vite 133 0 28

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit d017673 · Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:55:56 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 220 (-6.4%) 1801 🔴 (+37%) 🔻 1873 🔴 (+39%) 🔻 2134 🔴 (+24%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 128 (-42%) 💚 1645 🔴 (+27%) 🔻 1691 🔴 (+29%) 🔻 1842 🔴 (+18%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 648 (-57%) 💚 2059 🔴 (+24%) 🔻 2128 🔴 (+26%) 🔻 2203 🔴 (+21%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 684 (+11%) 916 (+17%) 🔻 948 (-52%) 💚 2512 (+25%) 🔻 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 2123 (+13%) 5760 (+102%) 🔻 5787 (-22%) 💚 9279 (+1.0%) 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 137 (+12%) 179 (+19%) 🔻 204 (+19%) 🔻 358 (+44%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 177249 (+16%) 🔻 177249 (+16%) 🔻 177249 (+16%) 🔻 177249 (+16%) 🔻 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 65 (+27%) 🔻 100 (+23%) 🔻 207 (+33%) 🔻 238 (+44%) 🔻 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 76.5 (+9%) 209 (+31%) 317 (+3%) 757 (+31%) 189 (+43%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 88.5 (+19%) 216 (+42%) 489 (+125%) 962 (+32%) 169 (-8%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 99 (+38%) 163 (+24%) 220 (+28%) 508 (-10%) 546 (+84%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 93 (+25%) 156 (+22%) 204 (+13%) 400 (-1%) 315 (+11%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 100 (+9%) 325 (+68%) 438 (+56%) 754 (+52%) 303 (+7%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 152228ms → this run 177089ms (Δ +24861ms, +16%)

100-150 ms  ██┃████████████████████   main 757  this 100  -657
150-200 ms  ███████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░┃  main 232  this 798  +566
200-250 ms  █┃                        main  20  this  81   +61
250-300 ms  ┃                         main   7  this  22   +15
300-350 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   6    +5
350-400 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   5    +4
400-450 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   2    +2
450-500 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   2    +2
500-550 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
550-600 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
600-650 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
650-700 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50          p90         p99     n
control  ······▂█▃▁···  167.7 (+41%)  138 (+38%)    317 (+3%)  757 (+31%)  3000
sweep    ······▂█▃▁···  171.5 (+30%)  132 (+17%)  489 (+125%)  962 (+32%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁▃█▂▁···    141 (+21%)  126 (+25%)   220 (+28%)  508 (-10%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁▄█▂····  129.1 (+12%)  112 (+10%)   204 (+13%)   400 (-1%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▁█▇▁···  219.3 (+46%)  178 (+38%)   438 (+56%)  754 (+52%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▇█▅▅▃▃▂▅▂▁  128–217ms
sweep    ▃▃▂▁▁▂▆█▄▂  133–253ms
gw 1x    █▃▄▄▁▁▁█▅▄  117–173ms
eve 1x   ▅▁▃▃▁▃▇█▅▂  109–157ms
eve 2x   ▁▂▇▂▁▅▆█▅▃  172–290ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▆█▇▇█▁▁  169–173ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  █▆▄▃▄▂▅▃▃▁  42–78ms
sweep    ▄▃▁▁▂▅██▅▁  56–92ms
gw 1x    █▅▄▃▁▃▂▆▂▄  34–55ms
eve 1x   ▇▃▅▃▄▄█▁▇▇  21–30ms
eve 2x   ██▅▅▆▇▇▁▄▇  22–37ms
📜 Previous results (1)

a06b597

Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:33:02 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 957 (+386%) 🔻 1296 🔴 (+22%) 🔻 1331 🔴 (+22%) 🔻 1455 🔴 (+21%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 186 (+5.7%) 1258 🔴 (+25%) 🔻 1291 🔴 (+26%) 🔻 1333 🔴 (+29%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 473 (-56%) 💚 1515 🔴 (+28%) 🔻 1546 🔴 (+21%) 🔻 2091 🔴 (+5.6%) 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 572 (-3.7%) 794 (-54%) 💚 1936 (+11%) 2000 (+8.9%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1478 (-6.4%) 5197 (+36%) 🔻 9597 (+143%) 🔻 10211 (-5.8%) 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 111 (+7.8%) 132 (-7.0%) 148 (-11%) 198 (-35%) 💚 1019
WO 1020 steps 134816 (-8.6%) 134816 (-8.6%) 134816 (-8.6%) 134816 (-8.6%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 56 (-14%) 83 (-38%) 💚 110 (-39%) 💚 331 (+21%) 🔻 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 70 (-20%) 118 (-24%) 172 (-23%) 433 (+9%) 94 (-40%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 74.5 (-23%) 132 (-50%) 249 (-50%) 598 (-36%) 135 (-44%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 102 (-1%) 112 (-37%) 178 (-47%) 590 (-12%) 401 (+23%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 101 (-39%) 111 (-26%) 159 (-21%) 480 (+16%) 426 (+9%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 66 (-53%) 178 (-28%) 336 (-4%) 743 (+47%) 580 (+58%) 3
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). █ = main, ┃ = this run, ░ = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 41 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
✅ smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
✅ smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
✅ hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
✅ step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
✅ parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
✅ in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
❌ in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Framework Flow route Step reg. Framework output
hono 236.0 KiB (±0) 42.3 KiB (±0) 1.80 MiB (±0)
nextjs-turbopack 242.2 KiB (±0) 439 B (±0) 836.0 KiB (±0)
About these numbers

Sizes are gzip; parentheses show the change against main.
Flow route and Step reg. gate this job, on raw bytes rather than the gzip shown, at max(2%, 50.0 KiB). Framework output is informational.

d017673 · run

Comment thread .changeset/lazy-v4-event-metadata.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: Peter Wielander <mittgfu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Kalyan <105607645+karthikscale3@users.noreply.github.com>
…load-schema

Signed-off-by: Karthik Kalyanaraman <karthik.kalyanaraman@vercel.com>

# Conflicts:
#	packages/world-vercel/src/events-v4.ts
…' into fix/v4-lazy-event-payload-schema

Signed-off-by: Karthik Kalyanaraman <karthik.kalyanaraman@vercel.com>

# Conflicts:
#	.changeset/lazy-v4-event-metadata.md
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 merged commit 86eb822 into main Sep 11, 2026
178 of 182 checks passed
@karthikscale3
karthikscale3 deleted the fix/v4-lazy-event-payload-schema branch September 11, 2026 16:33
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for 86eb822 (AI decision).

The commit only adds tests (plus a changeset) for the lazy v4 event-metadata decoding path, and that behavior does not exist on stable: origin/stable:packages/world-vercel/src/events-v4.ts has no OMITTED_EVENT_PAYLOAD handling and performs no frame schema validation at all (no SCHEMA_VALIDATION path), so neither the bug nor the fix it covers is present there. Backporting would add tests asserting main-only behavior, which would simply fail on stable.

To override, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

86eb8229f89e48afe95fb68aa5922d22fc76573b

This branch was successfully deployed

18 active deployments
Preview – workflow-swc-playground — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-webpack — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-docs — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nuxt-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-sveltekit-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-vite-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-fastify-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-astro-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-tarballs — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nestjs-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nitro-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-tanstack-start-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-express-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-hono-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-web — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-python-workflow — d017673a Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants