Skip to content

[core] Stop sending a slot snapshot on step executor writes - #4096

Merged
pranaygp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pgp/drop-executor-slot-snapshot
Sep 11, 2026
Merged

pranaygp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pgp/drop-executor-slot-snapshot

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygp pranaygp commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

The step executor no longer sends eventCount (the slot snapshot, maxSlot on the v4 wire) on any of its writes: step_started, step_retrying, step_completed, step_failed. Removes the executor's knownSlot / observeSlot machinery, its slotSnapshot param, and the batchCommittedSlotCeiling the suspension handler computed only to seed that param.

The replay loop's and the suspension handler's own snapshots are unchanged.

Why

Since #3479 every replay-context write reports the log position it was computed against. The only thing any World does with that number today is bump-and-report: when the write lands above the named position, the World reads the events in between and returns them on the response so the writer can merge them without a second round-trip. No World rejects on it (world-vercel's server, world-local and world-postgres were all checked; #3479 itself notes the Vercel fence "cannot fire" on these runs).

The replay loop and the suspension handler merge that page into the log they are replaying from. The step executor has no log: it runs from a queued delivery or an inline claim, so it took the page's highest position and discarded the rest. The read was made for nothing.

Production, 24h, workflow_server.slot.skipped_reports by event_type:

event_type writes report reads share of writes page used by SDK
step_started 32.6M 10.82M 33.1% no
step_completed 31.8M 1.00M 3.1% no
step_created 32.0M 0.63M 2.0% yes
hook_created 2.6M 0.26M 10.0% yes
wait_created 4.0M 0.14M 3.5% yes

Each of those reads is a strongly consistent DynamoDB query on the run partition (up to 100 events, refs resolved) on the write's response path. Under spec 7 the server assigns positions from an atomic counter, so the client's number plays no part in allocation either.

The World contract for eventCount already says it is omitted by "callers with no loaded log to be stale against"; the executor now matches it.

Companion

The server-side half declines the report read for these event types regardless of what the client sent, since every already-deployed SDK still sends maxSlot: vercel/workflow-server#944.

Validation

  • packages/core: full suite, 2402 passed / 3 expected fail / 1 skipped. Three tests updated: two asserted the executor's eventCount advanced across its writes (now assert it is absent), one asserted the removed batchCommittedSlotCeiling.
  • pnpm typecheck on core, biome check clean on changed files, node scripts/check-changesets.mjs passes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The only thing a World does with `eventCount` is bump-and-report: when the
write lands above the position named, it reads the events in between and
returns them so the writer can merge them without a second round-trip. The
replay loop and the suspension handler merge that page into their loaded
log. The step executor has no log to merge into, so it took the page's
highest position and discarded the rest.

In production that discarded read fell on a third of all `step_started`
writes (10.8M of 13.4M skipped-slot report reads per day were on executor
event types), each a strongly consistent DynamoDB query on the run
partition with resolved refs, on the response path. This removes the
executor's `knownSlot` / `observeSlot` machinery, the `slotSnapshot`
executor param, and the `batchCommittedSlotCeiling` the suspension handler
computed only to seed it. The loop's and the suspension handler's own
snapshots are unchanged; they consume their reports.

The World contract already describes omitting the count for a caller with
no loaded log to be stale against; the executor now matches it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 11, 2026 02:45
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2026 02:45
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 06b9df8

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 20 packages
Name Type
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/world Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/world-local Patch
@workflow/world-postgres Patch
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 11, 2026 2:49am UTC

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

✅ All tests passed

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • addTenWorkflow (vite)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (nextjs-turbopack)
  • deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (express)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 02:50:49Z · abandoned wrun_01M275Z3MMM6V5B3CJ8FBYQC87
  • run-pickup-stall · plainModuleDoneHook resumed via plain API route (o2flow shape) (nextjs-webpack) · at 02:58:52Z · abandoned wrun_01M276E73AKD16PZYMMREDHAZY

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 3662 0 685 4347
✅ 💻 Local Development 3922 0 586 4508
✅ 📦 Local Production 3922 0 586 4508
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 3922 0 586 4508
✅ 🪟 Windows 320 0 2 322
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 68 0 74 142
✅ vercel-http-transport 823 0 143 966
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 424 0 59 483
Total 17090 0 2721 19811
Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 133 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ example-node 133 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ express-node 133 0 28
✅ express-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ fastify-node 133 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ hono-node 133 0 28
✅ hono-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ nest-node 133 0 28
✅ nest-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 158 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 158 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 158 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 158 0 3
✅ nitro-node 133 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ nuxt-node 133 0 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ python-node 66 0 95
✅ sveltekit-node 152 0 9
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 152 0 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 133 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 133 0 28
✅ vite-node 133 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 133 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 8
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 8
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 27
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 27

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 8
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 8
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 27
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 27

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 20
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 8
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 8
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 27
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 27
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 27

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 160 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 160 0 1

✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ python 68 0 74

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 133 0 28
✅ express 133 0 28
✅ hono 133 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 158 0 3
✅ nitro 133 0 28
✅ vite 133 0 28

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 133 0 28
✅ express 133 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 158 0 3

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit 06b9df8 · Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:01:58 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 1114 (+49%) 🔻 1360 🔴 (+24%) 🔻 1395 🔴 (+21%) 🔻 1679 🔴 (+24%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 1128 (+344%) 🔻 1246 🔴 (+16%) 🔻 1309 🔴 (+18%) 🔻 1340 🔴 (+19%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 1380 (+60%) 🔻 1458 🔴 (+12%) 1487 🔴 (+8.9%) 1525 🔴 (-21%) 💚 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 492 (-19%) 💚 784 (-4.2%) 852 (+1.8%) 1809 (+1.9%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1558 (-1.7%) 5123 (+15%) 🔻 5141 (-23%) 💚 8270 (-3.8%) 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 98 (-14%) 129 (-5.1%) 145 (-5.2%) 197 (±0%) 1019
WO 1020 steps 129680 (-4.8%) 129680 (-4.8%) 129680 (-4.8%) 129680 (-4.8%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 52 (-31%) 💚 86 (-37%) 💚 103 (-61%) 💚 218 (-23%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 79 (-19%) 112 (-55%) 170 (-65%) 318 (-50%) 89.5 (-68%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 66.5 (-32%) 119 (-72%) 163 (-78%) 420 (-64%) 105 (-70%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 65 (-54%) 121 (-32%) 178 (-27%) 528 (+12%) 351 (-4%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 73 (-35%) 121 (-42%) 168 (-62%) 422 (-63%) 488 (-15%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 80 (-41%) 162 (-67%) 216 (-68%) 520 (-41%) 351 (-25%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 136104ms → this run 129536ms (Δ -6568ms, -5%)

 50-100 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
100-150 ms  ███████████████████████┃  main 894  this 950   +56
150-200 ms  ┃██                       main 117  this  58   -59
200-250 ms  ┃                         main   8  this   6    -2
250-300 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
300-350 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
350-400 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
400-450 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50         p90         p99     n
control  ······█▇▁····  100.9 (-50%)   97 (-40%)  170 (-65%)  318 (-50%)  3000
sweep    ······█▆▁····  103.1 (-63%)   96 (-49%)  163 (-78%)  420 (-64%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁█▄▁▁···  103.5 (-31%)   88 (-35%)  178 (-27%)  528 (+12%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁█▅▁▁···  101.1 (-47%)   80 (-40%)  168 (-62%)  422 (-63%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▅█▂▁···  134.7 (-50%)  118 (-45%)  216 (-68%)  520 (-41%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  █▁▂█▂▃▂▁▄▆  95–110ms
sweep    ▅▂▂▅█▆▂▂▁▂  86–133ms
gw 1x    ▂▁▆▂▃█▂▂▁▁  88–152ms
eve 1x   ▂▃▂▅▃▁▆▆█▃  86–123ms
eve 2x   ▄▁▄▄▅▄▅██▂  106–163ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▆▆█▆▅▁▁  101–105ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▅▄▆▃▃▄▁█▆▅  27–33ms
sweep    ▅▄▅▆█▅▃▁▁▃  32–49ms
gw 1x    ▄▂▄▂▃█▂▂▁▂  22–37ms
eve 1x   ▃▅▁▄▄▃▅▅█▇  17–27ms
eve 2x   █▂▃▂▅▅█▁▆▅  17–27ms
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). █ = main, ┃ = this run, ░ = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

No blocking issues were identified; the remaining test-title nit is non-blocking.

Pull request overview

This PR removes unused slot snapshots from step-executor writes while preserving replay and suspension-handler snapshots.

Changes:

  • Removed executor snapshot tracking and suspension ceiling plumbing.
  • Updated runtime behavior and tests.
  • Documented the contract change and added a changeset.
File summaries
File Summary
packages/world/src/events.ts Documents executor omission of eventCount.
packages/core/src/runtime/suspension-handler.ts Removes obsolete ceiling tracking.
packages/core/src/runtime/suspension-handler.test.ts Updates suspension-handler assertions.
packages/core/src/runtime/step-executor.ts Removes snapshot propagation.
packages/core/src/runtime/step-executor.test.ts Verifies executor writes omit snapshots.
packages/core/src/runtime.ts Stops passing snapshots to inline executors.
packages/core/src/runtime.test.ts Updates inline-claim expectations.
.changeset/drop-executor-slot-snapshot.md Records the package changes.
Review details

Suppressed comments (1)

packages/core/src/runtime/step-executor.test.ts:217

  • The updated assertion now verifies that no snapshot is sent, but this test's it title above still says "without displacing the slot snapshot." Please rename the test to describe the no-snapshot behavior so the test output does not contradict what it covers.
    // An executor write names no log position: it has no log to merge a
    // skipped-slot report into, so it must not ask the World to read one.
    expect(started[0]?.[2]?.eventCount).toBeUndefined();
  • Files reviewed: 8/8 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 41 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
✅ smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
✅ smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
✅ hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
✅ step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
✅ parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
✅ in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
❌ in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Framework Flow route Step reg. Framework output
hono 201.6 KiB (±0) 42.3 KiB (±0) 1.79 MiB (-676 B)
nextjs-turbopack 207.8 KiB (±0) 439 B (±0) 779.2 KiB (-208 B)
About these numbers

Sizes are gzip; parentheses show the change against main.
Flow route and Step reg. gate this job, on raw bytes rather than the gzip shown, at max(2%, 50.0 KiB). Framework output is informational.

06b9df8 · run

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI review: no blocking issues

* the replay loop and the suspension handler, which merge the report below
* back into their loaded log. Omitted by callers with no loaded log to be
* stale against, the step executor included: for those the report would be
* a read the World does for no one.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review: Note

Two writers still send eventCount even though no one can use the page they draw, so this doc line is slightly ahead of the code:

  • Run-terminal writes from the replay loop (run_completed, run_failed at runtime.ts via createEvent, plus the replay-budget run_failed). Nothing replays the log afterward. deltaRequestCursor already excludes terminal types for sinceCursor; the snapshot could mirror that exclusion so non-Vercel Worlds skip the read too (world-local and world-postgres both do the report read on any eventCount).
  • The suspension handler's step_failed for an unserializable step input goes through createGuarded, so it names a position. That one does hold a log, so it is a legitimate sender; just noting it is not an executor write.

Not blocking; a follow-up is fine.

@@ -4334,36 +4334,6 @@ export function workflowEntrypoint(
retained: servedByRetainedSession,
});

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review: Note

Worth stating somewhere near here (or in the World contract doc) that the QuickJS engine sends neither eventCount nor sinceCursor on any write (quickjs-entrypoint.ts documents this as a known gap). After this PR the node:vm engine's rule is "only log-holders name a position", and QuickJS is uniformly "nobody does", which is a different rule for the same World. I am opening a separate PR to bring QuickJS to parity, so no change needed here.

@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 6cc851c into main Sep 11, 2026
185 of 187 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/drop-executor-slot-snapshot branch September 11, 2026 19:57
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for 6cc851c (AI decision).

This is a performance optimization, not a defect fix: it stops the step executor from sending eventCount so the World skips a skipped-slot report read whose page the executor discarded anyway. Nothing is broken on stable — the extra DynamoDB read is wasteful, not a correctness, data-loss, or resource-exhaustion problem — and the change additionally removes the executor's knownSlot/observeSlot fencing input and the batchCommittedSlotCeiling field, a behavior change to existing internals that pairs with a server-side companion change (vercel/workflow-server#944).

To override, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

6cc851c34210f7c74141500e4849e00173c2791e

This branch was successfully deployed

18 active deployments
Preview – workflow-swc-playground — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-docs — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-webpack — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-sveltekit-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-tanstack-start-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-vite-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-fastify-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nuxt-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-express-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-tarballs — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-hono-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-astro-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nitro-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nestjs-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-web — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-python-workflow — 06b9df89 Deployed Sep 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants