Skip to content

feat(world-vercel): export openEventsChannel - #4469

Merged
pranaygp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pgp/world-vercel-export-events-channel
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

pranaygp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pgp/world-vercel-export-events-channel

Conversation

@pranaygp

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Exports world-vercel's openWsChannel from the package root as openEventsChannel.

A run's event writes only go over the WebSocket events transport while its channel is open, and only the queue handler opens one today. Code that writes a run's events outside a queue delivery (a custom driver, a long-lived process, a harness running inside a Vercel Sandbox) has no public way to open the channel, so all of its writes go over HTTP. The only workaround is importing dist/ws-transport.js by path.

This came out of the harness-on-world prototype (vercel-labs/harness-on-world), which drives agent sessions directly on a World from Functions and Sandbox VMs. Measured there, an acknowledged write costs about 60-75ms over WS versus 85-100ms over HTTP.

  • packages/world-vercel/src/index.ts: re-export, with a doc comment on the release contract.
  • README.md: a short "Events channel" section.
  • A test covering the export and the two undefined cases (transport disabled; a projectConfig World).

It doesn't add a linger after the last release. That touches the refcount race documented on openWsChannel, so it's left for a follow-up if wanted.

Test plan

  • vitest run src/events-channel-export.test.ts src/ws-transport.test.ts in packages/world-vercel: 79 passed.
  • tsc --noEmit, biome and node scripts/check-changesets.mjs are clean.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…eue delivery

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 473f6a1

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 17 packages
Name Type
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 29, 2026 12:13am UTC

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

✅ All tests passed

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 00:13:31Z · abandoned wrun_01M3N848ZZNW3E3A5VFG01HDDK
  • run-pickup-stall · hookSignalOwnerWorkflow - duplicate forwards its payload to the owner via resumeHook (nuxt) · at 00:15:28Z · abandoned wrun_01M3N87ZDBXQF12YWHZASH1RBY
  • run-pickup-stall · hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion (nextjs-webpack) · at 00:21:03Z · abandoned wrun_01M3N8J644X89MCPGC9XPS0PG4

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 3878 0 739 4617
✅ 💻 Local Development 4238 0 550 4788
✅ 📦 Local Production 4238 0 550 4788
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 4238 0 550 4788
✅ 🪟 Windows 340 0 2 342
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 68 0 84 152
✅ vercel-http-transport 873 0 153 1026
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 591 0 93 684
Total 18491 0 2721 21212
Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 141 0 30
✅ astro-quickjs 141 0 30
✅ example-node 141 0 30
✅ example-quickjs 141 0 30
✅ express-node 141 0 30
✅ express-quickjs 141 0 30
✅ fastify-node 141 0 30
✅ fastify-quickjs 141 0 30
✅ hono-node 141 0 30
✅ hono-quickjs 141 0 30
✅ nest-node 141 0 30
✅ nest-quickjs 141 0 30
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 168 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 168 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 168 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 168 0 3
✅ nitro-node 141 0 30
✅ nitro-quickjs 141 0 30
✅ nuxt-node 141 0 30
✅ nuxt-quickjs 141 0 30
✅ python-node 66 0 105
✅ sveltekit-node 160 0 11
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 160 0 11
✅ tanstack-start-node 141 0 30
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 141 0 30
✅ vite-node 141 0 30
✅ vite-quickjs 141 0 30

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ express-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ express-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ hono-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ nest-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 161 0 10
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 161 0 10
✅ tanstack-start-node 142 0 29
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ vite-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 142 0 29

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ express-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ express-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ hono-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ nest-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 161 0 10
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 161 0 10
✅ tanstack-start-node 142 0 29
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ vite-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 142 0 29

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ express-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ express-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ hono-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ nest-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 170 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 161 0 10
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 161 0 10
✅ tanstack-start-node 142 0 29
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 142 0 29
✅ vite-stable-node 142 0 29
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 142 0 29

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 170 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 170 0 1

✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ python 68 0 84

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 141 0 30
✅ express 141 0 30
✅ hono 141 0 30
✅ nextjs-turbopack 168 0 3
✅ nitro 141 0 30
✅ vite 141 0 30

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 141 0 30
✅ express 141 0 30
✅ nextjs-turbopack 168 0 3
✅ vite 141 0 30

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit 473f6a1 · Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:34:53 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 337 (-0.6%) 2366 🔴 (+23%) 🔻 2462 🔴 (+25%) 🔻 2936 🔴 (+26%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 340 (-5.8%) 2449 🔴 (+25%) 🔻 2502 🔴 (+13%) 2865 🔴 (+21%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 695 (-67%) 💚 2736 🔴 (+23%) 🔻 2774 🔴 (+22%) 🔻 2868 🔴 (+23%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 631 (+22%) 🔻 865 (+5.5%) 899 (-0.6%) 1110 (-54%) 💚 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1594 (-33%) 💚 5222 (+0.8%) 5477 (-4.2%) 8568 (+18%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 113 (-9.6%) 154 (-5.5%) 171 (-6.6%) 256 (-36%) 💚 1019
WO 1020 steps 154927 (-6.5%) 154927 (-6.5%) 154927 (-6.5%) 154927 (-6.5%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 76 (-6.2%) 120 (+5.3%) 171 (+34%) 🔻 278 (+46%) 🔻 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 110 (+12%) 164 (-41%) 244 (-65%) 563 (-69%) 138 (-58%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 99.5 (0%) 152 (-23%) 188 (-78%) 290 (-79%) 131 (-47%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 103 (-14%) 143 (-31%) 182 (-41%) 393 (-60%) 195 (-72%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 107 (-6%) 149 (-41%) 176 (-96%) 343 (-95%) 240 (-93%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 106 (+6%) 176 (-65%) 227 (-86%) 389 (-89%) 312 (-56%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 165228ms → this run 154630ms (Δ -10598ms, -6%)

  100-150 ms  ███████████████████░░░░┃  main 539  this 664  +125
  150-200 ms  ███████████┃███           main 425  this 330   -95
  200-250 ms  ┃                         main  34  this  13   -21
  250-300 ms  ┃                         main   7  this   4    -3
  300-350 ms  ┃                         main   3  this   3    +0
  350-400 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   5    +5
  400-450 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
  550-600 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
  750-800 ms  ┃                         main   4  this   0    -4
  800-850 ms  ┃                         main   2  this   0    -2
  850-900 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
1050-1100 ms  ┃                         main   2  this   0    -2
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50         p90         p99     n
control  ······▂█▁▁···  141.8 (-34%)  129 (-10%)  244 (-65%)  563 (-69%)  3000
sweep    ······▂█▁····  130.1 (-37%)  124 (-13%)  188 (-78%)  290 (-79%)  3000
gw 1x    ······▃█▁····  126.1 (-26%)  119 (-16%)  182 (-41%)  393 (-60%)  5295
eve 1x   ······▃█▁····  128.4 (-77%)  120 (-19%)  176 (-96%)  343 (-95%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▂█▂▁···  150.6 (-52%)  142 (-18%)  227 (-86%)  389 (-89%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▄█▃▁▁▂▂▂▁▂  129–184ms
sweep    █▆▅▄▄▆▃▂▁▃  117–146ms
gw 1x    █▄▃▄▄▆▅▁▅▂  116–139ms
eve 1x   ▂▆▆▆▁█▆▃▄▂  120–137ms
eve 2x   ▁▁▂▂▁▅▅█▄▃  134–188ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▅▅▆██▁▅  128–132ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▇▂▁▆▁█▅▃▄▃  38–50ms
sweep    ▃█▇█▇▁▅▆▅▇  44–59ms
gw 1x    ▇█▅▁▃▆▆▃▄▁  36–44ms
eve 1x   ▃█▁▄▄▅▄▂▃▅  22–30ms
eve 2x   ██▄▄▇█▄▁▃█  18–28ms
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). █ = main, ┃ = this run, ░ = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@pranaygp
pranaygp marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2026 00:09
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2026 00:09
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings September 29, 2026 00:09

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 42 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
✅ smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
✅ smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ step-vs-timer-early-settlement completed 8 1.0h ok 0
✅ long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
✅ hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
✅ step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
✅ parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
✅ in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
❌ in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Framework Flow route Step reg. Framework output
hono 265.3 KiB (±0) 96.2 KiB (±0) 1.93 MiB (-623 B)
nextjs-turbopack 272.8 KiB (±0) 426 B (±0) 940.4 KiB (+15.5 KiB)
About these numbers

Sizes are gzip; parentheses show the change against main.
Flow route and Step reg. gate this job, on raw bytes rather than the gzip shown, at max(2%, 50.0 KiB). Framework output is informational.

473f6a1 · run

@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 2d8b8a3 into main Sep 29, 2026
180 of 181 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/world-vercel-export-events-channel branch September 29, 2026 00:15
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for 2d8b8a3 (AI decision).

This commit adds a new public API surface — re-exporting openWsChannel as openEventsChannel from @workflow/world-vercel's package root — so that callers outside a queue delivery can opt into the WebSocket events transport. That is additive feature work (a new export plus its README section and test), not a fix for a defect on stable, and the motivation is a latency improvement for an external prototype rather than a correctness or stability problem. The patch changeset does not change that classification.

To override, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

2d8b8a33d57d9b9aa90f15d3f7b6372f01e5799e

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview – workflow-docs — 473f6a15 Deployed Sep 29, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants