Skip to content

fix(core): make dynamic start() refusals fatal - #4531

Merged
alangenfeld merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
alangenfeld/dynamic-start-fatal-refusals
Oct 1, 2026
Merged

alangenfeld merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
alangenfeld/dynamic-start-fatal-refusals

Conversation

@alangenfeld

@alangenfeld alangenfeld commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary & Motivation

Every deterministic refusal start() makes before writing anything threw a plain WorkflowRuntimeError, which the step executor retries — so a step calling start() with dynamic source burned its whole retry budget on the opt-in being off, then reported retry exhaustion instead of the refusal. A World's validateRunExecutionContext throw becomes a fresh fatal error carrying the World's message with the original as cause, since that object may be frozen, shared, or not an Error. A start whose current deployment could not be determined stays retryable; only a confirmed mismatch is fatal.

Known limit: when workflow code calls start() directly (start is itself a step), the fatal marker does not survive the step boundary, so FatalError.is() is false on the error the workflow catches — the step still fails without retrying.

Test Plan

Unit tests added in start.test.ts.

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 33c64ee

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 17 packages
Name Type
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch
@workflow/world-vercel Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 30, 2026 10:00pm UTC

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit 33c64ee · Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:23:05 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 2488 (+241%) 🔻 2650 🔴 (+143%) 🔻 2696 🔴 (+142%) 🔻 2908 🔴 (+142%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 2417 (+999%) 🔻 2539 🔴 (+142%) 🔻 2575 🔴 (+135%) 🔻 2654 🔴 (+86%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 2824 (+222%) 🔻 3012 🔴 (+127%) 🔻 3045 🔴 (+117%) 🔻 3079 🔴 (+97%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 577 (-34%) 💚 831 (-51%) 💚 849 (-52%) 💚 2998 (+60%) 🔻 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 2125 (-7.3%) 3611 (-0.5%) 3701 (-2.0%) 11327 (+57%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 172 (+72%) 🔻 217 (+67%) 🔻 236 (+53%) 🔻 318 (+57%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 213233 (+62%) 🔻 213233 (+62%) 🔻 213233 (+62%) 🔻 213233 (+62%) 🔻 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 87 (+21%) 🔻 114 (-20%) 💚 126 (-41%) 💚 130 (-63%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 101 (+3%) 179 (-7%) 233 (-23%) 574 (+17%) 150 (-33%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 99.5 (-4%) 172 (-24%) 214 (-39%) 303 (-52%) 143 (-32%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 98 (-28%) 150 (-21%) 182 (-43%) 286 (-50%) 194 (-56%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 128 (+22%) 166 (-16%) 201 (-34%) 294 (-47%) 214 (-53%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 98 (-31%) 237 (-28%) 301 (-38%) 498 (-47%) 194 (-59%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 131526ms → this run 212681ms (Δ +81155ms, +62%)

100-150 ms  ┃███████████████████████  main 899  this   0  -899
150-200 ms  ███░░░░░░░░┃              main 108  this 446  +338
200-250 ms  █░░░░░░░░░░░░┃            main   8  this 509  +501
250-300 ms  ┃                         main   2  this  49   +47
300-350 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   9    +9
350-400 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   4    +3
400-450 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
450-500 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
500-550 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50         p90         p99     n
control  ······▁█▂▁···   151.4 (-4%)   140 (+1%)  233 (-23%)  574 (+17%)  3000
sweep    ······▁█▁····  149.1 (-15%)   144 (-7%)  214 (-39%)  303 (-52%)  3000
gw 1x    ······▂█▁····  132.1 (-17%)   129 (-5%)  182 (-43%)  286 (-50%)  5295
eve 1x   ······▂█▁····  140.1 (-14%)   131 (-3%)  201 (-34%)  294 (-47%)  5186
eve 2x   ······▁█▄▁···    178 (-23%)  161 (-25%)  301 (-38%)  498 (-47%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▁▅█▂▃▁▃▄▂▃  140–176ms
sweep    ▄▁▃▄▃█▅█▄▄  143–155ms
gw 1x    ▁▃▂▂▂▂▃▅▃█  127–144ms
eve 1x   ▃▄█▃▁▄▆▃▃▂  127–161ms
eve 2x   ▂▁▄▁▁▂▅█▄▄  153–230ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▁▅█▅▄▅▃  148–150ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▂█▁▃▄▅▂▇▅▆  37–49ms
sweep    ▂▃█▇▄▆▆▅▂▁  54–67ms
gw 1x    ▄▄▄▁▅▅▅█▅█  33–44ms
eve 1x   ▇██▆▄▇▅▃▁▄  22–28ms
eve 2x   ▅▄▃▃▄▂▃▁▄█  20–37ms
📜 Previous results (2)

2e9ba36

Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:19:32 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 710 (-2.6%) 2541 🔴 (+133%) 🔻 2611 🔴 (+134%) 🔻 2764 🔴 (+130%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 2248 (+922%) 🔻 2611 🔴 (+148%) 🔻 2655 🔴 (+142%) 🔻 3004 🔴 (+111%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 2886 (+229%) 🔻 3164 🔴 (+138%) 🔻 3254 🔴 (+132%) 🔻 5307 🔴 (+240%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 628 (-28%) 💚 1036 (-39%) 💚 1162 (-35%) 💚 3024 (+62%) 🔻 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 2120 (-7.5%) 3510 (-3.3%) 3836 (+1.6%) 11688 (+62%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 171 (+71%) 🔻 209 (+61%) 🔻 226 (+47%) 🔻 298 (+47%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 207532 (+58%) 🔻 207532 (+58%) 🔻 207532 (+58%) 🔻 207532 (+58%) 🔻 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 88 (+22%) 🔻 112 (-21%) 💚 134 (-37%) 💚 153 (-57%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 101 (+2%) 174 (-9%) 215 (-29%) 312 (-37%) 133 (-41%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 100 (-3%) 173 (-23%) 236 (-33%) 314 (-50%) 141 (-34%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 96 (-30%) 163 (-14%) 193 (-40%) 263 (-54%) 177 (-59%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 121 (+15%) 168 (-15%) 199 (-35%) 308 (-44%) 248 (-46%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 131 (-8%) 211 (-35%) 260 (-47%) 419 (-55%) 193 (-59%) 3

92925a4

Wed, 30 Sep 2026 20:19:04 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 2438 (+234%) 🔻 2618 🔴 (+140%) 🔻 2659 🔴 (+139%) 🔻 2914 🔴 (+142%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 2450 (+1014%) 🔻 2600 🔴 (+147%) 🔻 2659 🔴 (+142%) 🔻 2768 🔴 (+94%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 2701 (+208%) 🔻 2912 🔴 (+119%) 🔻 2936 🔴 (+109%) 🔻 3247 🔴 (+108%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 623 (-28%) 💚 2964 (+73%) 🔻 3022 (+69%) 🔻 3173 (+69%) 🔻 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 2166 (-5.5%) 5593 (+54%) 🔻 6906 (+83%) 🔻 10491 (+45%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 129 (+29%) 🔻 205 (+58%) 🔻 243 (+58%) 🔻 481 (+137%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 218846 (+66%) 🔻 218846 (+66%) 🔻 218846 (+66%) 🔻 218846 (+66%) 🔻 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 69 (-4.2%) 110 (-23%) 💚 334 (+58%) 🔻 415 (+17%) 🔻 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 99.5 (+1%) 156 (-19%) 241 (-20%) 4418 (+798%) 116 (-49%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 90 (-13%) 224 (-1%) 368 (+4%) 571 (-10%) 159 (-25%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 103 (-25%) 153 (-19%) 191 (-41%) 581 (+1%) 332 (-24%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 254 (+143%) 154 (-22%) 187 (-39%) 318 (-42%) 431 (-5%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 94 (-34%) 202 (-38%) 341 (-30%) 713 (-24%) 388 (-17%) 3
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). █ = main, ┃ = this run, ░ = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

✅ All tests passed

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • a run can take over its own earlier hook (astro · local-dev / local / node / stable)
  • hookTokenReuseLoopWorkflow - same run recreates a hook with the same token after dispose() (nuxt · local-dev / local / quickjs / stable)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

  • run-pickup-stall · maxRetries=0 disables retries (nextjs-turbopack) · at 22:00:12Z · abandoned wrun_41M3T59P220GHNV5W50AK0N2DC
  • run-pickup-stall · runs app-generated source against a registered step (tanstack-start) · at 22:01:05Z · abandoned wrun_01M3T5BBAWRBZ5KGPAGPGW26JK
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 22:01:13Z · abandoned wrun_01M3T5BBBDMSMFWQQTMJPP850G
  • run-pickup-stall · hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion (nextjs-webpack) · at 22:06:07Z · abandoned wrun_01M3T5MHPDXXPS0M4JCKXX11B3

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 3904 0 875 4779
✅ 💻 Local Development 4406 0 550 4956
✅ 📦 Local Production 4406 0 550 4956
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 4406 0 550 4956
✅ 🪟 Windows 342 0 12 354
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 68 0 84 152
✅ dynamic-runs 0 0 0 0
✅ vercel-http-transport 879 0 183 1062
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 595 0 113 708
Total 19033 0 2917 21950
Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 142 0 35
✅ astro-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ example-node 142 0 35
✅ example-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ express-node 142 0 35
✅ express-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ fastify-node 142 0 35
✅ fastify-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ hono-node 142 0 35
✅ hono-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ nest-node 142 0 35
✅ nest-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 169 0 8
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 169 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 169 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 169 0 8
✅ nitro-node 142 0 35
✅ nitro-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ nuxt-node 142 0 35
✅ nuxt-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ python-node 66 0 111
✅ sveltekit-node 161 0 16
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 161 0 16
✅ tanstack-start-node 142 0 35
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 142 0 35
✅ vite-node 142 0 35
✅ vite-quickjs 142 0 35

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 167 0 10
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 167 0 10
✅ tanstack-start-node 148 0 29
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 148 0 29

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 167 0 10
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 167 0 10
✅ tanstack-start-node 148 0 29
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 148 0 29

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ express-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 176 0 1
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 176 0 1
✅ nitro-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 167 0 10
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 167 0 10
✅ tanstack-start-node 148 0 29
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-node 148 0 29
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 148 0 29

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 171 0 6
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 171 0 6

✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ python 68 0 84

✅ dynamic-runs

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-vercel 0 0 0
✅ example-vercel 0 0 0
✅ express-vercel 0 0 0
✅ fastify-vercel 0 0 0
✅ hono-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nest-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nitro-vercel 0 0 0
✅ nuxt-vercel 0 0 0
✅ sveltekit-vercel 0 0 0
✅ tanstack-start-vercel 0 0 0
✅ vite-vercel 0 0 0

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 142 0 35
✅ express 142 0 35
✅ hono 142 0 35
✅ nextjs-turbopack 169 0 8
✅ nitro 142 0 35
✅ vite 142 0 35

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 142 0 35
✅ express 142 0 35
✅ nextjs-turbopack 169 0 8
✅ vite 142 0 35

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 42 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
✅ smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
✅ smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ step-vs-timer-early-settlement completed 8 1.0h ok 0
✅ long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
✅ hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
✅ step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
✅ parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
✅ in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
❌ in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Framework Flow route Step reg. Framework output
hono 265.9 KiB (±0) 97.3 KiB (+47 B) 1.98 MiB (+1.0 KiB)
nextjs-turbopack 273.3 KiB (±0) 426 B (±0) 979.7 KiB (+75 B)
About these numbers

Sizes are gzip; parentheses show the change against main.
Flow route and Step reg. gate this job, on raw bytes rather than the gzip shown, at max(2%, 50.0 KiB). Framework output is informational.

33c64ee · run

Signed-off-by: Alex Langenfeld <alex.langenfeld@vercel.com>
…oyment retryable

Signed-off-by: Alex Langenfeld <alex.langenfeld@vercel.com>
@alangenfeld
alangenfeld force-pushed the alangenfeld/dynamic-start-fatal-refusals branch from 2e9ba36 to 33c64ee Compare September 30, 2026 21:55
@alangenfeld
alangenfeld merged commit 14dbfdc into main Oct 1, 2026
184 of 185 checks passed
@alangenfeld
alangenfeld deleted the alangenfeld/dynamic-start-fatal-refusals branch October 1, 2026 15:42
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for 14dbfdc (AI decision).

This fixes retry behavior for dynamic start() refusals, but the dynamic-workflows feature does not exist on stable: packages/core/src/runtime/dynamic-workflow.ts is absent there (git ls-tree origin/stable) and stable's start.ts contains no experimental_dynamic/dynamicWorkflow code at all. The change therefore fixes main-only functionality and has nothing to correct on the maintenance line.

To override, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

14dbfdc1f52e838854b6ee70398b742e4850e891

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview – workflow-docs — 33c64ee6 Deployed Sep 30, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants