refactor: Global renaming from hpmn to evo - #5508
Conversation
thephez
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Generally, I think this substitution is better than just shortening to Evo:
HighPerformance -> Evolution
But not too concerned especially for internal stuff...
Let's gather everyone's opinion first. |
"evo" is good for rpc, because shorter to type - better. |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
|
@UdjinM6 Your opinion ? |
|
I'm fine with either option. EDIT: It does add a bit of inconsistency though (rpc filters/fields use "evo")... 🤔 |
|
@PastaPastaPasta @UdjinM6 @thephez @knst RPC names: |
|
What about the Dash Core wallet ? It still shows 'Number of HPMN's' in the Windows - Information tab. Will this pull request change that to Evo ? Also the filter on tab Masternodes - Type state 'HighPerformance', will that be changed by this pull request as well ? |
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
|
LGTM overall, pls see d16b7ee for a couple of small suggestions in comments |
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
PastaPastaPasta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
utACK for squash merge
* docs(rpc): convert protx hpmn commands to protx evo Relates to dashpay/dash#5508 * docs(rpc): minor change * docs(rpc): minor update
* docs(rpc): convert protx hpmn commands to protx evo Relates to dashpay/dash#5508 * docs(rpc): minor change * docs(rpc): minor update
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
What was done?
Renaming of all classes/variables/functions/rpcs from
hpmntoevo.How Has This Been Tested?
All unit and func tests are passing.
Sync of Testnet.
Breaking Changes
All protx RPCs ending with
_hpmnwere converted to_evo._hpmnRPCs are now deprecated.Although, they can still be enabled by adding
-deprecatedrpc=hpmn.Checklist: