Repository navigation
[copilot-session-insights] Daily Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-10-03 #65281
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-10-04T07:31:28.589Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🤖 Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-10-03
Executive Summary
📈 Session Trends Analysis
Completion Patterns
Completion rate continues its saw-tooth pattern (40.0% → 36.0% today), oscillating around the 40-day mean of 32.25% with no sustained upward or downward trend. Today's -4.0pt dip keeps the rate mid-pack (17th of 41 recorded days) rather than signaling a new regime.
Duration & Efficiency
Average duration spiked to 13.8 min (from 4.8 min on 10-02), driven by one 66.8 min outlier (
Content Moderation); the median (5.4 min) moved far less and remains in the normal range seen over the past two weeks.Key Metrics
Success Factors ✅
True-agentic channel fully recovered: The 6 runs from the actual Copilot-authored channels — "Addressing comment on PR" (Include WorkQ claims in the admission prompt #65192 ×2, Update lethal trifecta landing page copy #65115 ×1, Prevent base config restore from clobbering an external root checkout #65069 ×2) and "Running Copilot cloud agent" ×1 — resolved 6/6 = 100%, with zero unexplained cancellations (contrast with 10-02's 1 unexplained cancellation).
Addressing comment on PR #65069succeeded twice in the window (02:47:47Z and 03:49:33Z), i.e. the agent responded to review feedback and the gate re-ran clean each time.Isolated (non-cascading) runs succeed far more often than clustered ones: runs that fired alone at their timestamp succeeded 76.5% (13/17) of the time, vs. only 15.2% (5/33) for runs fired as part of a same-second burst — a 5.04× gap.
Code scanning AI findings on PR #65192success at 01:25:41Z stands in contrast to the 8-run failure burst 51 seconds later.Code-scanning / doc-build checks on completed PR branches stayed green: all 5
Code scanning AI findings on PR #65069and#65192runs across the window succeeded (5/5), independent of the CI-gate bundle's outcome on the same branch.Failure Signals⚠️
Recurring 8-run merge/PR-event cascade: at 02:16:35Z, 8 workflows on
copilot/update-admission-js-workq-claimfailed within the same second —PR Data Prefetch,Design Decision Gate,Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer,Test Quality Sentinel,CJS,PR Code Quality Reviewer,Ponytail Reviewer,Impeccable Skills Reviewer. This is the identical workflow set as 10-02's 8-run cascade — ties the 2nd-largest cascade on record for a 2nd consecutive day, suggesting the invalidation trigger (merge/close/push-supersede) for this exact gate bundle is a recurring, not one-off, event.Branch-level stuck gate (not bimodal, just stuck):
copilot/restore-agent-config-foldersre-fired the sameCGO/CWI/Doc Build - Deploy/ compilation-integration bundle three separate times (03:18:23Z, 03:46:02Z, 04:11:25Z — ~28 min apart) and gotaction_requiredall three times, with no successful pass in between. Unlike 10-02's mixed CGO/CWI outcome on PR Bump gh-aw-firewall and gh-aw-mcpg versions #64917, this looks like a genuinely stuck gate rather than flaky alternation.Provenance inversion, sub-band again: of the 18 successes, only 12 (66.7%) came from bot/CI-gate channels — below the historical 72–86% band. This is the 5th sub-band day on record (joining 09-20, 09-26, 09-28, 10-01), which is frequent enough that it may be a recurring mode rather than noise; worth tracking whether it correlates with a specific day-of-week or merge cadence.
Prompt Quality Analysis 📝
Per-Prompt Breakdown
Not assessable this run: prompt/task-description text lives inside the agent conversation transcripts, and 0 of 50 runs had transcripts available (see data-quality notice above). No prompt examples are fabricated here.
Orphaned Branch Escalation Alerts 🚨
Summary
Escalation Candidate Details
Escalation Candidates
✅ No orphaned branches exceed the escalation threshold today. Only 2 workflow runs were in-progress at check time, both on
main, not matching any open PR branch.CI Waste Estimate
Notable Observations
Loop Detection and Session Diagnostics
Loop Detection
Tool Usage
Context Issues
Metadata-only diagnostics (available)
copilot/update-admission-js-workq-claim52.0% (26/50),copilot/restore-agent-config-folders34.0% (17/50),copilot/update-lethal-trifecta-copy14.0% (7/50) — 3 unique branches.Content Moderationoncopilot/update-admission-js-workq-claimran 66.8 min (01:15:53Z–02:22:40Z), the longest of the window.Experimental Analysis
Standard analysis only this run — no experimental strategy triggered (roll=74/100, threshold is <30).
Actionable Recommendations
For Users Writing Task Descriptions
Not assessable this run — no prompt text was available from conversation transcripts to derive patterns from. Recommendations will resume once the conversation-log fetch is restored.
For System Improvements
copilot/update-admission-js-workq-claim-style branches: the exact same 8-workflow failure set fired on two consecutive days. If this is a deterministic consequence of a specific gate-bundle's dependency on a resource invalidated at merge/push/close time, it may be fixable by making the dependent gates skip cleanly instead of failing. Potential impact: Medium — reduces noisy failure counts without changing real pass/fail signal.For Tool Development
Historical Trends and Statistical Summary
Trends Over Time
Statistical Summary
Next Steps
copilot-session-data-fetch— this is now blocking the core mission for 41+ consecutive dayscopilot/update-admission-js-workq-claim-style 8-run cascade is deterministic and fixable at the gate-dependency levelReferences:
PR Data Prefetch, 02:16:35Z, failure)CGOgate oncopilot/restore-agent-config-folders(04:11:25Z, action_required)Addressing comment on PR #65069, 03:49:33Z)Analysis generated automatically on 2026-10-03
Analysis run: §37105033403
Workflow: Copilot Session Insights
All reactions