Minimize style.css - #11
Merged
Merged
Conversation
pftg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2026
3-agent review (ICP-E fit, SEO gaps, schedule pacing) identified: - 5 Rails posts scored 1/5 ICP-E relevance - 4 ICP-E pain points had zero posts (#3 transparency, #5 comms, #6 SLA, #7 code ownership) - #19 overlapped #5, #18 expired, #21 speculative, #14 cannibalized Dropped 4 low-ICP posts. Added 4 founder pain-gap replacements: - Weekly Dev Report Template (Pain #3, 44/50) - Dev Shop Contract: Code Ownership (Pain #7, 43/50) - How to Switch Dev Shops (transition, 42/50) - SLA Requirements Checklist (Pain #6, 41/50) Shifted ratio from 7:7:7 to 10:5:6 (Founders:Rails:AI). Swapped #9/#11 dates for Torvalds trend proximity. Published #5 (47 Startups) - trend decay risk from sitting in draft. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
pftg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2026
News-pegged to April 14, 2026 Linux kernel `Assisted-by:` rule. Founder- targeted essay on the contract gap between AI-generated code and human accountability, with five contract clauses + weekend self-audit + DCO explainer. Full team-mode pipeline: writer agent (patio11 cadence) → 3 review rounds × 3 personas in parallel (founder/SEO-slop/editor → senior dev/copywriter/AI detector → DevOps/conversion/tired reader) → cold-eyes Agent 4 9-check gate PUBLISH-READY. ~35 sentence-level fixes applied. SEO: title 28 chars, description 155 chars, 4 internal links inline (vibe-coding-crisis, pocketos, fire-dev-shop, hiring-dev-shop), 5 external citations (Hackaday, Veracode, Stanford AI Index, Security Boulevard, TechCrunch). Primary keyword "ai code ownership responsibility" in P1. Cover: Apr-14 dated commit-document SVG with HUMAN SIGNS seal. Build green: 661 pages, zero errors. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
pftg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2026
20.10 predicted on 2026-08-07 that the coverage gaps live in "the layers the suite treats as rendered output" and that "two mechanisms produce false greens". A week of claims work confirmed both with live defects, so §3b records the evidence and three new entries. P0-4: the marketing ratchet reads SOURCE. All three late defects were invisible to it and were found by looking at the built page - a false review count in an unglobbed partial, "Take You to the Next Level" in the careers h1 wrapped across two lines, and a nested <main> that only exists after compose. Fix is to add a rendered-output pass; it closes the class rather than three instances. P0-5: line-by-line matching cannot see wrapped prose, and the scrub helper compounded it by deleting words glued to closing tags. Strip template expressions and HTML tags before path tokens. P0-6: testimonial_shortcode_test asserted the literal h1 copy that marketing_copy_test bans. Two gates disagreed about one string and the ratchet lost silently. Assert shape, not marketing copy. Ranked open list follows, led by the rendered-output change and the claims audit. The number worth remembering: 4 of 8 published figures checked this cycle were wrong (reviewCount 32 -> 9, foundingYear 2011 -> 2008, a hardcoded 13+, a 15+), so the four still unverified - 95% retention, 92% success rate, 40+ rescues, 32 clients served - should be assumed suspect until checked. seo-review §6 gains actions #10 (verify those four) and #11 (rendered-output ratchet). .okf/log.md records the rule. Docs only. /okf:validate conformant; hugo-build 8/8. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.