Price the chunklaya route as chunklaya under a spending permit - #114
Merged
Merged
Conversation
postBeam sent every request through providerFetch under Beam's name, so a request routed to chunklaya was priced as beam:chunklaya/multilingual, which the price table does not have, and was refused as unpriced_model. The provider the function already receives is now the one it names. test/chunklaya.test.ts runs the route under a Permit, as production does, and asserts it is priced as chunklaya at zero. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #113.
postBeamsent every request throughproviderFetchunder Beam's name, so a request routed to chunklaya was priced asbeam:chunklaya/multilingual, which the price table does not have, and was refused with400 unpriced_model. The function now names the provider it already receives.Affected before this fix: only requests that route to chunklaya (inputs over 32,000 characters, or an explicit
model: "chunklaya"), which answered400 unpriced_modelinstead of being classified. Nothing else changed behaviour.test/chunklaya.test.tsgains a test that runs the route under a spendingPermit, as production does, and asserts it is priced as chunklaya at zero.Checks —
npm run typecheckclean;npm test801 pass / 0 fail.🤖 Generated with Claude Code