Skip to content

fix(world): accept lazy terminal run data - fix Zod schema for newer versions - #3914

Merged
shalabhc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
identify-condition-causing-reported-error-zod
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

shalabhc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
identify-condition-causing-reported-error-zod

Conversation

@shalabhc

@shalabhc shalabhc commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Problem

Lazy terminal responses carry outputRef or errorRef without materializing output or error. WorkflowRunSchema declared those terminal payload keys as required, which fails under Zod 4.4's required object property semantics.

Fix

Mark completed output and failed error explicitly optional, matching lazy World responses.

Tests

  • pnpm --filter @workflow/world test -- src/runs.test.ts
  • pnpm --filter @workflow/world build
  • Zod 4.4.3 one-step Preview: completed without callback errors
  • Zod 4.5.4: terminal schemas and Next.js production build pass

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 95315a2

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 20 packages
Name Type
@workflow/world Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/web Patch
@workflow/world-local Patch
@workflow/world-postgres Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 2, 2026 6:59pm UTC

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit 95315a2 · Wed, 02 Sep 2026 19:12:34 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 212 (+17%) 🔻 1235 🔴 (+11%) 1270 🔴 (+11%) 1301 🔴 (+4.8%) 30
TTFS stream 166 (-19%) 💚 1132 🔴 (±0%) 1224 🔴 (+4.8%) 1438 🔴 (+14%) 30
TTFS hook + stream 1337 (+5.9%) 1539 🔴 (+13%) 1578 🔴 (+12%) 1692 🔴 (+16%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 536 (-2.5%) 1030 (-45%) 💚 1811 (-4.2%) 2331 (+21%) 🔻 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1839 (+8.2%) 2752 (-32%) 💚 3606 (-14%) 8340 (+26%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 86 (-14%) 120 (-24%) 💚 148 (-22%) 💚 556 (+62%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 133827 (-14%) 133827 (-14%) 133827 (-14%) 133827 (-14%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 82 (-16%) 💚 109 (-33%) 💚 165 (-11%) 225 (-58%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 97 (-24%) 108 (-35%) 127 (-38%) 219 (-40%) 87.5 (-50%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 92.5 (-35%) 114 (-51%) 156 (-56%) 270 (-58%) 127 (-21%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 109 (-30%) 119 (-26%) 151 (-24%) 505 (-15%) 123 (-54%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 129 (-60%) 115 (-35%) 141 (-51%) 227 (-56%) 216 (-50%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 105 (-41%) 153 (-88%) 229 (-91%) 636 (-84%) 253 (-72%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 154195ms → this run 132613ms (Δ -21582ms, -14%)

  50-100 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   3    +3
 100-150 ms  ██████████████████░░░░░┃  main 706  this 925  +219
 150-200 ms  ┃█████                    main 227  this  56  -171
 200-250 ms  ┃                         main  48  this   7   -41
 250-300 ms  ┃                         main  19  this   1   -18
 300-350 ms  ┃                         main  10  this   0   -10
 350-400 ms  ┃                         main   4  this   1    -3
 400-450 ms  ┃                         main   2  this   6    +4
 450-500 ms  ┃                         main   2  this   5    +3
 500-550 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   3    +2
 550-600 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   6    +6
 600-650 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   3    +3
 650-700 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
 700-750 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
950-1000 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50         p90         p99     n
control  ······█▆▁····   97.4 (-30%)   94 (-28%)  127 (-38%)  219 (-40%)  3000
sweep    ······█▆▁····    101 (-37%)   94 (-33%)  156 (-56%)  270 (-58%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁█▄▁▁···     97 (-32%)   90 (-31%)  151 (-24%)  505 (-15%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁█▅▁····   97.1 (-36%)   90 (-30%)  141 (-51%)  227 (-56%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▅█▂▁···  131.1 (-68%)  116 (-37%)  229 (-91%)  636 (-84%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  █▆▃▃▁▂▅▃▂▄  89–110ms
sweep    ▆▃▁▁▂▂▂▄▅█  93–116ms
gw 1x    ▄▂▃▃▃▃▂▁█▂  86–123ms
eve 1x   ▂▄▄▃▁▂▇█▃▃  87–114ms
eve 2x   ▃▂▂▂▁▂▃█▄▂  96–223ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  █▇▅▅▂▁▂  99–103ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▃█▂▁▃▆▇▃▂▃  26–33ms
sweep    ▁▅▅▁▄█▇▆▇█  33–41ms
gw 1x    ▁▃▅▁▂▆█▂▃▅  25–29ms
eve 1x   ▁▅▄▂▃▃█▄▅▆  18–26ms
eve 2x   █▁▂▂▂▃█▄▂▄  19–25ms
📜 Previous results (1)

51a7ae3

Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:49:23 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 1264 (+82%) 🔻 1343 🔴 (+22%) 🔻 1363 🔴 (+22%) 🔻 1547 🔴 (+33%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 1262 (+22%) 🔻 1340 🔴 (+22%) 🔻 1388 🔴 (+24%) 🔻 1481 🔴 (+19%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 1178 (-4.0%) 1653 🔴 (+23%) 🔻 1736 🔴 (+26%) 🔻 1968 🔴 (-58%) 💚 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 514 (-7.6%) 859 (+3.6%) 1823 (+14%) 1969 (+5.7%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1953 (-3.8%) 2867 (+15%) 3844 (+8.2%) 8866 (+38%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 101 (+40%) 🔻 128 (-4.5%) 148 (-3.9%) 235 (+10%) 1019
WO 1020 steps 129442 (-3.8%) 129442 (-3.8%) 129442 (-3.8%) 129442 (-3.8%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 102 (-8.1%) 142 (-18%) 💚 159 (-23%) 💚 190 (-77%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 135 (-21%) 137 (-50%) 164 (-71%) 425 (-68%) 123 (-62%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 116 (-15%) 156 (-20%) 210 (-38%) 333 (-51%) 139 (-1%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 124 (-11%) 130 (-27%) 161 (-37%) 501 (-6%) 326 (-13%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 119 (-76%) 122 (-67%) 165 (-90%) 486 (-88%) 493 (-77%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 123 (-8%) 255 (-20%) 1804 (+277%) 3582 (+413%) 315 (-22%) 3
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). █ = main, ┃ = this run, ░ = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

❌ Some tests failed

❌ Failed E2E Tests

▲ Vercel Production (8 failed)

python-node (8 failed):

  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_41M1HQS2ZD0GS1Y39WAZC0JDJW | 🔍 observability
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_41M1HQSR8M0GM9K2NBEBWFNDNZ | 🔍 observability
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_41M1HQSRCC0GNEN5A3CWFZNS2W | 🔍 observability
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_41M1HQSYYV0GJJDN6KE38Q33S4 | 🔍 observability
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M1HQXXX70GKDMEMAA7F5T52G | 🔍 observability
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M1HQXY0T0GNN4SZ14B866N7K | 🔍 observability
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_41M1HQY44R0GWA8CN00XCGEZ1S | 🔍 observability
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_41M1HQYN3J0GT35JEE8K79DCNE | 🔍 observability

🌐 Cross-language Conformance (9 failed)

python (9 failed):

  • deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds | wrun_01M1HQZF2WX8XVVN4Y42C09STA
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_41M1HQS2ZD0GS1Y39WAZC0JDJW
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_41M1HQSR8M0GM9K2NBEBWFNDNZ
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_41M1HQSRCC0GNEN5A3CWFZNS2W
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_41M1HQSYYV0GJJDN6KE38Q33S4
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M1HQXXX70GKDMEMAA7F5T52G
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M1HQXY0T0GNN4SZ14B866N7K
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_41M1HQY44R0GWA8CN00XCGEZ1S
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_41M1HQYN3J0GT35JEE8K79DCNE

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • addTenWorkflow (hono)
  • promiseRaceWorkflow (fastify)
  • sleepWinsRaceWorkflow (tanstack-start)
  • webhookWorkflow (hono)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

34 infra events
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (python) · at 18:57:59Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQMRAQ0GRMFJTVPQTMF8MY · (+7 more)
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 18:58:15Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQRCYV0GGA00VDHNZ0XXNT
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 18:58:15Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQRCYY0GHHNXRCJRH8Q49R
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 18:58:15Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQRCYT0GNQJSK8RKZE13PY
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 18:58:15Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQRCYM0GHCDHH2CB1Z2X42
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 18:58:16Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQRD9C0GS24G8QGR2B6FFQ
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 18:58:48Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQSCVW0GPDBR2YYSS1TKBR
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 18:59:15Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQT85X0GN21ST9W0KX1369
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 18:59:15Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQT87H0GZP8GMXCY10BRQE
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 18:59:16Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQT8690GWD236S9Y9ZZB4D
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 18:59:16Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQT8RN0GMWKWFKX7H7WFTY
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 18:59:42Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQTPGT30GVN9ZGZ1GV5WJG
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 19:00:06Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQTBW80GSBGJBXQ4NF0Q0V
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (python) · at 19:00:35Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQSGNBX54G8FR7AS1SRQ3G · (+7 more)
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 19:00:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQX5SVE7A69XAK160NXYXR
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 19:00:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQX5T244V7B4N3J5G36Y3V
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 19:00:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQX5T4JZGMPE9SKQT3G47J
  • run-pickup-stall · deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (python) · at 19:00:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQX5STEV692VYCV9NAJY3M
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 19:00:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQX5T0WQJQCMGHVRS3DP3Y
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 19:01:47Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQW9QQ0GRKPRHXY92ASARD
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 19:01:47Z · abandoned wrun_41M1HQX3RT0GS51V7KHRNB06K0
  • run-pickup-stall · deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (python) · at 19:01:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQZ0DG7GPH84K8263P9HXC
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 19:01:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQZ0DJ6NDP54QWAF53Z6XS
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 19:01:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQZ0DNTFWJKBAS6P5A1MVE
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 19:01:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQZ0DRW6TXSWB2GRD4MV9Q
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 19:01:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HQZ0DYGQB5WD6YXF0YRVKP
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 19:02:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HR0V16FEMZK2RCHN2KX9VQ
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 19:02:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HR0V1NBG9FX7BF8BVDK9SF
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 19:02:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HR0V1DDHHAZYVJGEQ2EXN3
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 19:03:20Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HR1RCTFXJZJ34F1P34A6Z9
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 19:03:20Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HR1RD4K34WG7BATEJWA2WZ
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 19:03:50Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HR2NMRKMRFR84N1CMQMFRA
  • run-pickup-stall · hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion (nextjs-webpack) · at 19:07:25Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HR971V2AV9B59XTARFNWWN
  • run-pickup-stall · concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously (nextjs-webpack) · at 19:07:29Z · abandoned wrun_01M1HR9BM8WSFWR2Y6DPVYJGT9

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 3570 8 742 4320
✅ 💻 Local Development 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 📦 Local Production 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🪟 Windows 320 0 0 320
❌ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 0 9 132 141
✅ vercel-http-transport 817 0 143 960
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 553 0 87 640
Total 17053 17 2778 19848
Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 132 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ example-node 132 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ express-node 132 0 28
✅ express-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ fastify-node 132 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ hono-node 132 0 28
✅ hono-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nest-node 132 0 28
✅ nest-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nitro-node 132 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-node 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 132 0 28
❌ python-node 0 8 152
✅ sveltekit-node 151 0 9
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 151 0 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 132 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ vite-node 132 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 132 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 160 0 0

❌ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
❌ python 0 9 132

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ hono 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ nitro 132 0 28
✅ vite 132 0 28

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ vite 132 0 28

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 41 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
✅ smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
✅ smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
✅ hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
✅ step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
✅ parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
✅ in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
❌ in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Framework Flow route Step reg. Framework output
hono 200.9 KiB (±0) 40.6 KiB (±0) 1.77 MiB (+1 B)
nextjs-turbopack 206.3 KiB (±0) 439 B (±0) 765.5 KiB (+2 B)
About these numbers

Sizes are gzip; parentheses show the change against main.
Flow route and Step reg. gate this job, on raw bytes rather than the gzip shown, at max(2%, 50.0 KiB). Framework output is informational.

95315a2 · run

@shalabhc
shalabhc marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2026 00:36
@shalabhc
shalabhc requested a review from a team as a code owner September 1, 2026 00:36
@shalabhc shalabhc changed the title fix(world): accept lazy terminal run data fix(world): accept lazy terminal run data - fix Zod schema for newer versions Sep 1, 2026

@NathanColosimo NathanColosimo left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@NathanColosimo
NathanColosimo enabled auto-merge (squash) September 1, 2026 20:06
Co-Authored-By: Shalabh Chaturvedi <7066873+shalabhc@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-Authored-By: shalabhc <shalabh.chaturvedi@vercel.com>
@shalabhc
shalabhc disabled auto-merge September 2, 2026 19:15
@shalabhc
shalabhc merged commit 4a18b01 into main Sep 2, 2026
183 of 185 checks passed
@shalabhc
shalabhc deleted the identify-condition-causing-reported-error-zod branch September 2, 2026 20:06
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2026
github-actions Bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2026
Co-authored-by: vercel[bot] <35613825+vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shalabh Chaturvedi <shalabh.chaturvedi@vercel.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #3939. Merge conflicts were resolved by AI — please review carefully. (backport job run)

This branch was successfully deployed

18 active deployments
Preview – workflow-swc-playground — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-webpack — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-docs — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-vite-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-sveltekit-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-fastify-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nestjs-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-astro-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-tarballs — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nuxt-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-tanstack-start-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nitro-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-hono-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-express-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-web — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-python-workflow — 95315a21 Deployed Sep 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants