Skip to content

Validate pending changesets in CI so a bad one fails the PR instead of the Release job - #3964

Merged
pranaygp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pgp/check-changesets-ci
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

pranaygp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
pgp/check-changesets-ci

Conversation

@pranaygp

@pranaygp pranaygp commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #3963, which fixed the changeset that blocked releases today.

Why

changeset version assembles a release plan from every pending changeset before it bumps anything, and throws on a changeset it cannot place there:

  • one naming a package that is not in the workspace;
  • one mixing a package from .changeset/config.json#ignore (private workbench/sim packages like @workflow/world-sim) with published ones.

#3938 shipped the second kind, and every push to main after it failed in the Release job with nothing published, until #3963. Nothing at PR time ran that step. changeset status --since=main cannot serve as the gate: it only sees changesets added since the base, and it also exits non-zero when a package changes without a changeset, which this repo does not enforce in CI.

What

  • scripts/check-changesets.mjs runs the same assembly changeset version runs, on the same inputs (getPackages, config, changesets, pre.json), and stops before the network-bound changelog generation. It resolves the changesets libraries from @changesets/cli's own install, so it uses exactly the versions the Release job uses and adds no root dependencies. Declaring them as root devDependencies was tried first and reshuffled ~2300 lockfile lines through a supports-color peer re-resolution, so that approach was dropped.
  • lint.yml gains a Changesets job that runs the script on every PR and push to main.
  • CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md tell agents not to list ignored packages in a changeset. The existing "include all changed packages" rule is what led to the bad changeset in [core] Settle a hook's awaiter in-process instead of re-invoking, on creation and on conflict #3938.

Verified locally

On current main:

✓ 682 changeset(s) read, 12 pending (pre mode, tag "beta"); 21 package(s) would be released.

With the @workflow/world-sim line re-added to hook-conflict-delta-worlds.md (exit 1):

✗ The pending changesets cannot be turned into a release plan.
  `changeset version` will fail on main with this error:

    Found mixed changeset hook-conflict-delta-worlds
    Found ignored packages: @workflow/world-sim
    Found not ignored packages: @workflow/world @workflow/world-local
    Mixed changesets that contain both ignored and not ignored packages are not allowed

With a changeset naming @workflow/does-not-exist (exit 1):

    Found changeset tmp-bogus for package @workflow/does-not-exist which is not in the workspace

No changeset: CI, scripts, and agent docs only.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…Release job

`changeset version` assembles a release plan from every pending changeset
before it bumps anything, and throws on a changeset it cannot place there:
one naming a package outside the workspace, or one mixing a package from
the `ignore` list with published ones. #3938 shipped the latter and every
push to main since has failed to publish (#3963). Nothing at PR time ran
that step.

scripts/check-changesets.mjs runs the same assembly on the same inputs,
resolving the libraries from @changesets/cli's own install so the check
uses exactly the versions the Release job does, and stops before the
network-bound changelog generation. lint.yml runs it on every PR.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pranaygp
pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2026 21:30
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 3, 2026 21:30
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Sep 3, 2026 9:34pm UTC

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: dba878a

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

✅ All tests passed

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (nest)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (nextjs-turbopack)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (nitro)
  • promiseAnyWorkflow (nextjs-webpack)
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 21:33:12Z · abandoned wrun_01M1MK0G9CEJ2C4DAZZDTVBNGT
  • run-pickup-stall · Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class (nextjs-webpack) · at 21:36:13Z · abandoned wrun_01M1MK6D0EXFFX8DNQV6AVFFSF

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 3636 0 684 4320
✅ 💻 Local Development 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 📦 Local Production 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🪟 Windows 320 0 0 320
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 68 0 73 141
✅ vercel-http-transport 817 0 143 960
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 553 0 87 640
Total 17187 0 2661 19848
Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 132 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ example-node 132 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ express-node 132 0 28
✅ express-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ fastify-node 132 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ hono-node 132 0 28
✅ hono-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nest-node 132 0 28
✅ nest-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nitro-node 132 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-node 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ python-node 66 0 94
✅ sveltekit-node 151 0 9
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 151 0 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 132 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ vite-node 132 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 132 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 160 0 0

✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ python 68 0 73

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ hono 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ nitro 132 0 28
✅ vite 132 0 28

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ vite 132 0 28

📋 View full workflow run

@vercel
vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – workflow-docs September 3, 2026 21:30 Inactive
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit dba878a · Thu, 03 Sep 2026 21:46:25 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 1149 (+16%) 🔻 1265 🔴 (+14%) 1303 🔴 (+16%) 🔻 1551 🔴 (+32%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 1204 (+398%) 🔻 1259 🔴 (+17%) 🔻 1270 🔴 (+16%) 🔻 1316 🔴 (+12%) 30
TTFS hook + stream 630 (+25%) 🔻 1540 🔴 (+12%) 1572 🔴 (+11%) 1903 🔴 (+17%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 527 (-13%) 1832 (-2.1%) 1843 (-7.8%) 1961 (-8.6%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1832 (-19%) 💚 3512 (-16%) 💚 4426 (-0.8%) 8743 (+18%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 84 (-22%) 💚 129 (-6.5%) 149 (-8.0%) 184 (-21%) 💚 1019
WO 1020 steps 130554 (-5.8%) 130554 (-5.8%) 130554 (-5.8%) 130554 (-5.8%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 54 (-23%) 💚 90 (-24%) 💚 123 (-24%) 💚 749 (+276%) 🔻 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 74 (-20%) 106 (-32%) 138 (-60%) 244 (-56%) 81.5 (-49%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 84 (-12%) 124 (-43%) 323 (-5%) 726 (+15%) 150 (-15%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 65 (-28%) 105 (-47%) 134 (-58%) 358 (-54%) 304 (-19%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 109 (-16%) 111 (-44%) 150 (-53%) 306 (-76%) 210 (-79%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 66 (-44%) 142 (-68%) 187 (-73%) 489 (-56%) 233 (-75%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 138397ms → this run 130391ms (Δ -8006ms, -6%)

 50-100 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
100-150 ms  ██████████████████████░┃  main 848  this 918   +70
150-200 ms  █┃██                      main 148  this  94   -54
200-250 ms  ┃                         main  15  this   5   -10
250-300 ms  ┃                         main   3  this   1    -2
300-350 ms  ┃                         main   3  this   0    -3
350-400 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
400-450 ms  ┃                         main   1  this   0    -1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50         p90         p99     n
control  ······█▄▁····   91.8 (-33%)   88 (-27%)  138 (-60%)  244 (-56%)  3000
sweep    ·····▁█▆▁▁···  115.6 (-30%)   95 (-34%)   323 (-5%)  726 (+15%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁█▃▁····   93.8 (-42%)   86 (-34%)  134 (-58%)  358 (-54%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁█▄▁····   94.6 (-44%)   84 (-33%)  150 (-53%)  306 (-76%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▇█▁▁···  118.7 (-54%)  107 (-48%)  187 (-73%)  489 (-56%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  █▅▂▂▁▁▄▆▁▃  86–103ms
sweep    █▅▂▂▂▄▃▁▂▁  88–187ms
gw 1x    █▆▂▄█▄▁▁▂▄  84–107ms
eve 1x   ▅▄▂▃▁▅█▅▃▄  79–115ms
eve 2x   ▃▁▃▂▂▃▄█▄▂  96–168ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▆█▇▇▆▃▁  113–117ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▄▄▃▁▆▄█▆▂▄  24–30ms
sweep    ▅▁▃▃▆█▆▂▃▁  33–50ms
gw 1x    █▆▄▂▇▃▂▂▁▅  21–29ms
eve 1x   ▄▆▁▁▂▄▄▂▃█  16–25ms
eve 2x   █▂▁▇▃▃▄▃▅▅  17–21ms
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). █ = main, ┃ = this run, ░ = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 41 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
✅ smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
✅ smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
✅ long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
✅ hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
✅ step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
✅ parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
✅ hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
✅ attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
✅ fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
✅ in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
❌ in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
✅ stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
✅ unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
✅ writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
✅ cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Framework Flow route Step reg. Framework output
hono 200.9 KiB (±0) 40.7 KiB (±0) 1.77 MiB (±0)
nextjs-turbopack 206.3 KiB (±0) 439 B (±0) 767.2 KiB (±0)
About these numbers

Sizes are gzip; parentheses show the change against main.
Flow route and Step reg. gate this job, on raw bytes rather than the gzip shown, at max(2%, 50.0 KiB). Framework output is informational.

dba878a · run

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The CI check is narrowly scoped to the known failure mode and the workflow integration is straightforward with no apparent functional risk.

Pull request overview

Adds a CI gate to fail pull requests early when pending changesets cannot be assembled into a valid release plan, preventing main releases from being blocked by an invalid changeset file.

Changes:

  • Add a scripts/check-changesets.mjs script that mirrors changeset version’s release-plan assembly validation (without changelog generation).
  • Add a new Changesets job to lint.yml to run the validation on PRs and pushes to main.
  • Update agent guidance to avoid including ignored/private packages in changesets.
File summaries
File Description
scripts/check-changesets.mjs Implements a fast CI-friendly validation that pending changesets can be converted into a release plan.
AGENTS.md Documents the “don’t include ignored packages in changesets” rule and points to the new validation.
.github/workflows/lint.yml Adds a dedicated CI job to run the changeset release-plan validation on PRs and main.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread AGENTS.md
- To check if one is needed, run `pnpm changeset status --since=main >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "no changeset needed" || echo "changeset needed"`
- Create a changeset using `pnpm changeset add`
- All changed packages should be included in the changeset. Never include unchanged packages.
- Never list a package from the `ignore` array in `.changeset/config.json` (private workbench and simulation packages such as `@workflow/world-sim`), even when the PR changes it. Changesets rejects a changeset that mixes ignored and published packages, and the failure only surfaces in the Release job on `main`. `node scripts/check-changesets.mjs` runs that validation locally; CI runs it in `lint.yml`.
@pranaygp
pranaygp merged commit 22a9668 into main Sep 4, 2026
187 checks passed
@pranaygp
pranaygp deleted the pgp/check-changesets-ci branch September 4, 2026 00:02
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for 22a9668 (AI decision).

This commit adds a new preventive CI job and validation script (scripts/check-changesets.mjs) plus an agent-docs note; it is additive tooling rather than a fix for anything currently broken on stable. The actual release-blocking defect was fixed separately in #3963, and stable remains buildable and releasable without this new gate, so it does not meet the "CI fix needed to keep stable releasable" bar. If maintainers want the same guard on the maintenance line, it can be forced through via workflow_dispatch.

To override, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

22a9668dcf51f9799c26be0a4c144670df46101e

pranaygp added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2026
…c-workflow-source

* origin/main: (22 commits)
  feat(streams): add writer session seam (#3832)
  docs: document WORKFLOW_NODE_HTTP in the v4 World docs (#4050)
  [world-vercel] Honor WORKFLOW_NODE_HTTP on the queue transport (#4044)
  feat(streams): add WebSocket capability gate (#3764)
  fix(world-local): retry JSON reads on Windows (#4051)
  [core] Add the wake-loop scenario to the event log race repro (#4017)
  [ci] Cap concurrent Vercel E2E action repo-wide (10 by default) (#4039)
  Add `Run#getWritable()` for appending to another run's stream (#3972)
  feat(streams): add WebSocket v1 client protocol contract (#3763)
  [swc-playground] Update to Next.js v16.3.4 (#4018)
  [core] Add a retention option to start() (#3787)
  fix(swc-plugin): register class expressions via an IIFE instead of by name (#3971)
  [docs] Fix prose typos across v4/v5 docs and the SWC plugin README (#3948)
  Validate pending changesets in CI so a bad one fails the PR, not the Release job (#3964)
  Version Packages (beta) (#3919)
  Classify Workflow stream failures (#3850)
  Drop the ignored @workflow/world-sim package from the hook_conflict delta changeset (#3963)
  Add attribute inspection to the CLI (#3950)
  [core] Settle a hook's awaiter in-process instead of re-invoking, on creation and on conflict (#3938)
  Use the storage APIs for run detail views (#3944)
  ...

This branch was successfully deployed

17 active and 1 inactive deployments
Preview – workflow-swc-playground — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-webpack — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nuxt-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-tanstack-start-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-astro-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-tarballs — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-hono-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nestjs-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-sveltekit-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-express-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-nitro-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-fastify-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-vite-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-web — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workbench-python-workflow — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – workflow-docs — dba878ab Deployed Sep 3, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants