Skip to content

chore(release): promote repository-standards to main - #29

Merged
scttbnsn merged 23 commits into
mainfrom
dev/repository-standards
Aug 16, 2026
Merged

chore(release): promote repository-standards to main#29
scttbnsn merged 23 commits into
mainfrom
dev/repository-standards

Conversation

@scttbnsn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Promotes the own-checklist compliance work (#28) to main: LICENSE (MIT), root AGENTS.md, lefthook with commit-msg and pre-push validation scripts, plus the merged onboarding-doc alignment. Reconcile merge is on the dev branch; verify with tree equality after merge.

Adds organization-wide community health defaults, validation, ownership, contribution guidance, security policy, and hardened workflow checks.
* ci(workflows): add reusable CI foundation

* fix(workflows): harden reusable release contracts
* feat(quality): add normalized reporting foundation

* test(quality): run reporting contracts in standards validation

* fix(quality): align report validator with schema

* test(quality): verify GitHub integration outputs
* ci(profile): make asset generation read-only

* fix(profile): restrict asset validation egress
* ci(review): add deduplicated Greptile summon

* fix(review): serialize exact-head Greptile summons

* test(review): lock Greptile security controls
go-ci.yml's test and lint jobs ran unconditionally, so a Go-less repo
that only wants the language-agnostic workflow-security (zizmor) job
couldn't call it. Add run-test/run-lint boolean inputs, mirroring the
existing run-govulncheck/run-workflow-security/etc. toggle pattern,
defaulting to true so existing callers see no behavior change.

Fixes: #18
* ci(workflows): add module-directory input to node-ci

Mirrors go-ci's module-directory idiom: a string input defaulting to
"." threaded into each fixed script's env as MODULE_DIRECTORY, so a
repo with several independently-gated Node projects can call node-ci
once per project. The default preserves current behavior for existing
callers.

Extends the reusable CI contract test to assert the new input and its
threading, matching how run-test/run-lint were added for go-ci in #19.

* test(workflows): assert module-directory threads into all three node jobs
* docs(onboarding): align with the codified standards registry

- docs(onboarding): name Codecov as the coverage cloud; Qlty Cloud App and
  maintainability badge stay, checks stay non-required
- docs(onboarding): trivy deprecated in favor of Grype, including the qlty
  plugin blocks in the two reference configs (drydock#753, portwing#135)
- docs(onboarding): CodeRabbit free Pro is public-only; private repos use
  cross-account human review
- docs(onboarding): add the greptile.json contract and the label-gated
  second-opinion caller

* docs(onboarding): reword the CodeRabbit private-repo claim as org policy

- docs(onboarding): free-plan private-repo reviews exist but are
  rate-limited and never fired here; the skip is policy, not a plan fact
- docs(onboarding): pair the Greptile caller with auto-applied CodeRabbit
  labeling so the second-opinion label is criteria-driven
* chore(repo): meet our own onboarding checklist

- chore(repo): MIT LICENSE (infrastructure repos are MIT; products AGPL)
- docs(repo): root AGENTS.md with repo-specific rules and validation
- build(hooks): lefthook with commit-msg + pre-push mirroring CI via
  scripts/validate.sh

* fix(hooks): tighten the commit-msg exemptions and mirror zizmor's CI flags

- fix(hooks): merge/revert exemptions match git's generated subjects only,
  so a hand-typed 'Merge ...' subject no longer bypasses the check
- fix(hooks): require a non-whitespace character after the colon
- fix(hooks): zizmor runs --no-online-audits locally, matching CI's
  online-audits: false for local/CI parity

* fix(hooks): exempt only git-generated merge and revert subjects
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@scttbnsn, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 51 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 73ae6469-a906-4516-8dc6-21c5f427f91c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09b1ea3 and 5bc5208.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • AGENTS.md
  • LICENSE
  • lefthook.yml
  • scripts/check-commit-msg.sh
  • scripts/validate.sh

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@scttbnsn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@scttbnsn
scttbnsn merged commit 088e825 into main Aug 16, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants